DMMO T338
The details for DMMO Application T338 are below.
| Ref no | T338 |
|---|---|
| Applicant | Jonathan Stuart (on behalf of Trail Riders Fellowship) |
| Organisation | Friends of Dorsets Rights of Way - Application Now Managed by Mr D Tilbury, TRF |
| Applicant's address |
MARTIN INDUSTRIES LTD, UNITS 10 AND 11, MILTON BUSINESS CENTRE, WICK DRIVE, NEW MILTON, BH25 6RH |
| Date of application | 14 July 2004 |
| Date received | 05 December 2004 |
| Application form | Download application form |
| Application map | Download application map |
| DMMO Type | Upgrade |
| Claimed Status | Byway |
| Application/Case details | Upgrade FP 11(PT) Batcombe, add Byway from FP 3 to BR 18, Leigh and upgrade BR 59, Leigh to Byway |
| Start grid ref | 361709,105513 |
| End grid ref | 361709,105513 |
| Parish | Batcombe CP, Leigh CP |
| Location | Bailey Drove |
| Village | Batcombe, Leigh |
| Town | Dorchester |
| DC Contact | Vanessa Penny |
| Case Officer | Anne Brown |
| Report to Committee or Report under delegated powers and decision |
15 September 2005 - Accept
07 October 2010 - Refuse - not compliant with Schedule 14 W & C Act 1981 05 October 2020 - Accept - decided by Report to Executive Director of Place (delegated powers) |
| Date of determination | 05 October 2020 |
| Date order sealed | 2021-03-12 00:00:00 |
| Date order published | 2021-04-01 00:00:00 |
| End date objections/representations | 13 May 2021 |
| Objection received? | Yes |
| Objection withdrawn? | No |
| If not, process for determination? | Written Representations |
| Decision of Sec. of State | Confirm |
| Date order confirmed | 08 November 2023 |
| Date order published | 04 July 2024 |
| Case status | In Progress |
| Comments | DCC rejected the applications 7 October 2010 on the ground that the maps that had accompanied the applications had been by computer generated enlargements of Ordnance Survey (OS) maps drawn to a scale of 1:50,000 and not by maps drawn to a scale of not less than 1:25,000. The respondents' application for judicial review was dismissed by the Administrative Court but the appeal was allowed by the Court of Appeal , Civil Division 23/4/13. In dismissing the authority's appeal, the Supreme Court (heard 15/1/2015) held that a map which accompanied an application, and was presented at a scale of no less than 1:25,000, satisfied the requirement in para1(a) of Sch14 of the of being 'drawn to the prescribed scale' in circumstances where it had been digitally derived from an original map with a scale of 1:50,000 - judgment on 18/3/2015. |
| Map |
|
Related Documents
Order Confirmed
- Batcombe & Leigh confirmed order T338.pdf - Uploaded 05/07/2024
- T338 NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION Pub.pdf - Uploaded 05/07/2024
Report to Committee or under delegated powers
- T338 Delegated Report Oct 2020.pdf - Uploaded 05/01/2021