DMMO T354
The details for DMMO Application T354 are below.
| Ref no | T354 |
|---|---|
| Applicant | Jonathan Stuart (on behalf of Trail Riders Fellowship) |
| Organisation | Friends of Dorsets Rights of Way - Application Now Managed by Mr D Tilbury, TRF |
| Applicant's address |
MARTIN INDUSTRIES LTD, UNITS 10 AND 11, MILTON BUSINESS CENTRE, WICK DRIVE, NEW MILTON, BH25 6RH |
| Date of application | 21 December 2004 |
| Date received | 06 February 2005 |
| Application form | Download application form |
| Application map | Download application map |
| DMMO Type | Upgrade |
| Claimed Status | BR |
| Application/Case details | Upgrade BRs 17 and 35 and add part UCR and part unrecorded as BYWAY – Crabb's Barn Lane |
| Path number(s) | Bridleway 17 Beaminster CP, Bridleway 35 Beaminster CP |
| Start grid ref | 349116,103414 |
| End grid ref | 349116,103414 |
| Parish | Beaminster CP |
| Location | Crabbs Barn Lane |
| Town | Beaminster |
| DC Contact | Vanessa Penny |
| Case Officer | Contractor |
| Report to Committee or Report under delegated powers and decision |
07 October 2010 - Refuse - not compliant with Schedule 14 W & C Act 1981
|
| Date of determination | 21 March 2019 |
| Appeal | Yes |
| Date of appeal | 26 March 2019 |
| Direction by Sec. of State | Refuse |
| Date order sealed | 2020-01-24 00:00:00 |
| Date order published | 2020-02-06 00:00:00 |
| End date objections/representations | 20 March 2020 |
| Objection received? | Yes |
| Objection withdrawn? | No |
| If not, process for determination? | Written Representations |
| Decision of Sec. of State | Confirm |
| Date order confirmed | 29 July 2024 |
| Date order published | 15 August 2024 |
| Case status | In Progress |
| Comments | DCC rejected the applications 7 October 2010 on the ground that the maps that had accompanied the applications had been by computer generated enlargements of Ordnance Survey (OS) maps drawn to a scale of 1:50,000 and not by maps drawn to a scale of not less than 1:25,000. The respondents' application for judicial review was dismissed by the Administrative Court but the appeal was allowed by the Court of Appeal , Civil Division 23/4/13. In dismissing the authority's appeal, the Supreme Court (heard 15/1/2015) held that a map which accompanied an application, and was presented at a scale of no less than 1:25,000, satisfied the requirement in para1(a) of Sch14 of the of being 'drawn to the prescribed scale' in circumstances where it had been digitally derived from an original map with a scale of 1:50,000 - judgment on 18/3/2015. Submitted to the Planning Inspectorate for determination July 2021. |
| Map |
|
Related Documents
There are no related documents available